How We Calculated “Results That Matter”

Modeled, illustrative math based on placeholder inputs. Replace with client-specific studies as needed. We show all assumptions and derivations below.

What “Time” Includes
Manual timing starts when a packet is opened and ends at the first clean draft ready for review. Interruptions count only when they block completion.
Why Manual Takes Longer
Normalizing documents, HS lookups, re-keying across 7501/3461, and looped checks create repeated passes and context switching.
Why Platform Is Faster
Parsing, profiled defaults, and fail-fast business rules shift work from re-keying to single-screen confirmation.

Mathematical Model

Symbols
t_m = manual minutes per entry t_p = platform minutes per entry w = base labor rate (USD/hr) k = overhead multiplier c_ai = AI fee (USD/entry) c_rev= manual review fee (USD/entry) s = AI-processable share (0..1) r_m = manual rework rate r_p = platform rework rate N = entries per month
Equations
C_m = (t_m / 60) * w * k C_p = (t_p / 60) * w * k + s·c_ai + (1 − s)·c_rev TimeSaved = (t_m − t_p) / t_m CostSaved = (C_m − C_p) / C_m Rework↓ = (r_m − r_p) / r_m MonthlyΔ = N · (C_m − C_p)

Assumptions & Inputs

Manual time range
30–45 min
Platform time range
3–6 min
Example manual time tₘ
30 min
Example platform time tₚ
5 min
Labor rate w
$28.00/hr
Overhead k
1.30×
AI fee c_ai
$5.00/entry
Review fee c_rev
$0.50/entry
AI-processable share s
65.0%
Rework rₘ → rₚ
12.0% → 7.0%
Volume N
10,000
Range implications
TimeSaved ∈ [ 80%, 93% ]
CostSaved ∈ [ 61%, 81% ]
Rework↓ = 41.7% (given rₘ → rₚ)

Worked Example (uses the example point inputs)

C_m = (t_m / 60) · w · k = (30 / 60) · 28 · 1.30 = $18.20 per entry
C_p = (t_p / 60) · w · k + s·c_ai + (1 − s)·c_rev = (5 / 60) · 28 · 1.30 + 0.65·5.00 + (1 − 0.65)·0.50 = $6.46 per entry
TimeSaved = (t_m − t_p) / t_m = (30 − 5) / 30 = 83.3%
CostSaved = (C_m − C_p) / C_m = ($18.20 − $6.46) / $18.20 = 64.5%
Rework↓ = (r_m − r_p) / r_m = (0.12 − 0.07) / 0.12 = 41.7%
MonthlyΔ = N · (C_m − C_p) = 10,000 · ($18.20 − $6.46) = $117,416.67

Claims → Proof

Faster Turnaround
3–6 min
Platform processing time per entry
Proof: TimeSaved ∈ [ 80%, 93% ] because t_m ∈ [30, 45], t_p ∈ [3, 6], so (t_m − t_p)/t_m ≥ (30 − 6)/30 = 80%.
Lower Processing Cost
≈ 65%
Example cost savings per entry
Proof: C_m = $18.20, C_p = $6.46 ⇒ CostSaved = 64.5%. Range check: with time bounds, CostSaved ∈ [ 61%, 81% ].
Fewer Corrections
≈ 42%
Reduction in rework rate
Proof: (r_m − r_p)/r_m = (0.12 − 0.07)/0.12 = 41.7%.
83.3%
Faster turnaround (example)
30 → 5 minutes
64.5%
Cost savings per entry (example)
$18.20 → $6.46
41.7%
Fewer corrections
12.0% → 7.0%
$117,416.67
Monthly savings (example)
10,000 entries
Create An Account

Modeled estimates for demonstration; actual results depend on client workflows and commodity mix.